An article appeared in the daily Kalerkantho of September 04, 2011 produced by a Bangladesh professor in the USA which drew my attention. The heading of the article goes such “The Vice-Chancellors of public universities of Bangladesh want the status of MPs, why?” He has also mentioned that the government of Bangladesh has given the status of state-minister to the chairman of the UGC. The writer asks whether the government has given it willingly or the chairman of the UGC asked for it is not known to us. He was a professor, VC and is an educationist. The responsibility of the chairman is to review the budget regarding administrative and academic works of the universities. Can it be comparable to the status of state-minster? The status of a professor, chairman of UGC or VC to the students, guardians, educators, educationists and the people  more than a minster. Minister is not an expert or educationist but he is. A university is the centre of excellence, centre of learning and research. In the universities Teachers discover new theories, build knowledge and distribute it among the learners who gather here from different corners of the country. But the works, responsibilities and duties of an MP are different. The status between them cannot be evaluated using the traditional way or applying traditional belief or sense. Renowned educationist Dr. Malik Khasru said, “A university is not meant for  average  people, it’s for scholars only.“ A VC is a guide, philosopher, leader. All the creative activities centre round a Vice-Chancellor. He is the supervisor of creative people and makers. He himself is an institution. He is a monarch of his state. An MP is supposed to make laws of the country, listens to the problems of the people of his areas. When a teacher is rebuked by any police or any other organization hundreds and thousands of students willingly protest it. It hardly happens in case of an MP. So, their status cannot be equalized or considered in terms of the state run designations.